hmmm... well, if we make them "part" of gridcosm, i am worried a bit about it changing the feel -- the definition -- of gridcosm. (i mean to say if we make "side-links" or some such thing.) i am kinda leaning towards favoring thomas' idea of just putting them up as artchive images. then you could talk a little about them and/or link directly to the gridcosm level (in the artchive description). likewise, you could link to these images from the gridcosm discussion here. ((also, this makes my programming job easiest! haha))
|